On Tuesday 23 October 2007 15:58:21 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday 23 October 2007, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > On Monday 22 October 2007, Allen Winter wrote: > > > But, for definition purposes we should include extragear in the > > > Applications definition > > > > Wasn't one of the main points of extragear to give applications a home > > which aren't on the same release schedule as "core" KDE? > > (cut and paste from an email i sent in early october to another list): > > we'd like to allow developers in extragear to be able to opt in to having > time coordinated releases with the core kde modules (dev platform + > workspace + core apps). the apps that opt in will have their last stable > release included as tarballs alongside the main kde releases.
Ok. That makes sense. One question, though: Does it make sense to have both kind of applications in extragear, those that are released on the core KDE release schedule and those on their own schedule, or wouldn't it be better to move one kind to another module (say move the apps synced with core KDE to the module "kdemore") -- Cornelius Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
