On Tuesday 23 October 2007 06:50:19 pm Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Tuesday 23 October 2007 23:17:27 Allen Winter wrote: > > > > Regarding the proposed RC1: > > 1) we just managed to get Beta3 out the door last week. > > 2) according to [1] "... The Beta Cycle will continue until the critical > > products are determined to be functional (the "minimum requirements"). The > > progress can be seen [2]..." > > Is [2] up to date? > probably pretty close. toma usually nags each of the responsible persons a few days before the next tagging. toma, can you prepare your next nag please? :)
> > So I think we'll probably have to call the next release Beta4. > > We could rename the release to Beta4. But I would suggest to keep the freezes > as defined and cut off one RC, so that the plan for the final release stays > the same (at least for now). Sure. I'm arguing for a name change: RC1 => Beta4. It seems that Shakespeare was wrong: "...a rose by another name would NOT smell as sweet..." > > > [1] > > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Roadmap#Milestone:_Relea > >se_Candidate_Cycle [2] > > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.0_Release_Beta_Goals > _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
