Should I wait for someone else to need it or move it already? On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David Faure <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009, David Faure wrote: > > On Friday 20 March 2009, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > After some chat between John and me, we decided that, since KFormula > might > > > want to use this QtMMLWidget code at some point but we want that KDE > > > applications start to take advantage of MathML as soon as possible. > > > Our idea has been to put it to kdesupport until KFormula has forked it > (and > > > it is working) so that we can deprecate the QtSolution's in kdesupport. > Then > > > KFormula's widget would go to kdelibs. > > > > > > Is that ok? > > > > Sounds ok. Mark clearly the kdesupport code as "do not use in your kde > app" > > then. Not only because of SIC and BIC (which would be expected anyway > > until it's released) but because it will even go away once libkformula is > done... > > The alternative, of course, is to do all this in a work branch and commit > the result > directly to kdereview for kdelibs. Depends if you expect to be done before > 4.3 or not, > in fact: if yes then it doesn't make much difference and working in trunk > saves > from regular merges; if no then working in a work branch prevents temporary > classes > (and even a temporary lib) being released at 4.3 time. > > -- > David Faure, [email protected], sponsored by Qt Software @ Nokia to work on > KDE, > Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org > ). >
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
