On Monday 06 April 2009, Aleix Pol wrote: > To be fair, I'm not sure. I think it is nonsense to have it in abranch > because it already is up and running for trunk's KAlgebra, and I need it > there. We said it might be good to have it in kdesupport so that if somebody > else wanted to use it, he could without copying code. That's all. > > I'm not aware of any other users yet, btw.
OK... then it sounds to me like the code should stay in kalgebra until someone else needs it ;) Committing to retaining BC before it's actually needed, seems like unnecessary trouble. -- David Faure, [email protected], sponsored by Qt Software @ Nokia to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org). _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
