A Diumenge, 28 de novembre de 2010, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:28:23PM +0000, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Diumenge, 28 de novembre de 2010, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:16:47PM +0000, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft > > > > > > > > Yes the problem is that the policy contradicts what we are doing in > > > > reality. That's why there wasn't consensus. > > > > > > So improvements welcome, it's a wiki :) > > > > I thought you *needed* it to be exactly like that to convince "your > > bosses" at ubuntu to let you ship updates as part of the stable updates > > or something, if we change it to reflect reality I guess it won't be > > acceptable. > > > > But if you want I can update it with what i think is what we are doing > > now. > > That was my reason for starting on it but I think it would be a good > thing for KDE to have generally and I think it should be influenced > but not dictated by our downstreams, and it's pointless if it doesn't > reflect reality. So please do edit and see if consensus can be found.
I did some edits. Albert > > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
