Hey, On Sunday, November 28, 2010 17:16:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft > > Yes the problem is that the policy contradicts what we are doing in > reality. That's why there wasn't consensus.
To me, it sounds pretty much like how we've been handling things. I don't recall us accepting API changes after the API freeze (*and* after the subsequent .0 release). My memory might be playing tricks here, though, so please feel free to correct me. Otherwise, I think Jonathan's proposal is a reasonable policy that will make our lives easier (rgd. BC, SC and also proper functioning of our bindings). Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
