On Tuesday 30 November 2010 10:18:39 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Sorry if the wording turned out unfortunate it wasn't my intent there. It > was more about a reality check: > a) I can't devote much time to it on a regular basis (it's rather low on > my priority list), and I think I'm not the only one with that problem > since I hear this "let's move KDateEdit to kdelibs since *at least* 4.3"; > b) Until it's in kdelibs people will keep doing stuff in their own corner, > so the work I did so far will need to be done again for missing features > and so on, David's mail actually illustrate that well... The feature he > refers to wasn't there when I started. :-/ > > But OK, looks like I missed the window by a couple of weeks, so let's make > it for a "later release". > > Regards.
OK, so if it can't be in 4.6, how's this for a plan: * Merge Kevin's changes into the kdepim version so they are not lost and kdepim gets the benefit in the interim. * I bug fix the merged version in kdepim to fix the localization problems * Advertise loudly to all the projects with forks of KDateEdit that they may want to update their copy from kdepim. * When trunk reopens, we move to kdelibs and I'll start hacking on it Cheers! John. _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
