On Tuesday 30 November 2010 12:37:12 John Layt wrote: > On Tuesday 30 November 2010 10:18:39 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Sorry if the wording turned out unfortunate it wasn't my intent there. It > > > > was more about a reality check: > > a) I can't devote much time to it on a regular basis (it's rather low on > > > > my priority list), and I think I'm not the only one with that problem > > since I hear this "let's move KDateEdit to kdelibs since *at least* 4.3"; > > > > b) Until it's in kdelibs people will keep doing stuff in their own > > corner, > > > > so the work I did so far will need to be done again for missing features > > and so on, David's mail actually illustrate that well... The feature he > > refers to wasn't there when I started. :-/ > > > > But OK, looks like I missed the window by a couple of weeks, so let's > > make it for a "later release". > > > > Regards. > > OK, so if it can't be in 4.6, how's this for a plan: > * Merge Kevin's changes into the kdepim version so they are not lost and > kdepim gets the benefit in the interim. > * I bug fix the merged version in kdepim to fix the localization problems > * Advertise loudly to all the projects with forks of KDateEdit that they > may want to update their copy from kdepim.
You can count me in that list, I've a pet project with its own fork... > * When trunk reopens, we move to kdelibs and I'll start hacking on it Well, I'd be happy to pass it over someone else, so I definitely support that plan. ;-) Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
