A Thursday, June 09, 2011, Ian Monroe va escriure: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:28, Tom Albers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since it seems some modules are going to have their own numbers and some > > modules will have a different (git) workflow, which will inevitably > > result in different release schedules, I propose we stop producing the > > central release schedule as we have now. > > > > So http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.7_Release_Schedule is the > > last one we provide. From here on, I think it would be best if the > > module maintainer or the particular git maintainer sets up a release > > schedule for their own module / repo. He can use the sofware in > > playground/utils/releaseschedule for their convenience. > > > > Of course this list can be used to coordinate a combined release between > > modules and what not. > > > > Even if this plan is vetoed away, I personally will not make a new > > schedule, as I have no idea how to do that in the new setup and I've > > little interest in studying the new setup. > > > > Best > > What a very modest proposal.
Is that supposed to be read as an insult? Because i don't see why you should be insulting Tom, he made a proposal, and i have to think he he thinks is a good idea (even if i don't agree). Yes his proposal is a big change, but it wouldn't be the first big change we make, right? Albert > > Ian > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
