On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:12, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > A Thursday, June 09, 2011, Ian Monroe va escriure: >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:28, Tom Albers <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Since it seems some modules are going to have their own numbers and some >> > modules will have a different (git) workflow, which will inevitably >> > result in different release schedules, I propose we stop producing the >> > central release schedule as we have now. >> > >> > So http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.7_Release_Schedule is the >> > last one we provide. From here on, I think it would be best if the >> > module maintainer or the particular git maintainer sets up a release >> > schedule for their own module / repo. He can use the sofware in >> > playground/utils/releaseschedule for their convenience. >> > >> > Of course this list can be used to coordinate a combined release between >> > modules and what not. >> > >> > Even if this plan is vetoed away, I personally will not make a new >> > schedule, as I have no idea how to do that in the new setup and I've >> > little interest in studying the new setup. >> > >> > Best >> >> What a very modest proposal. > > Is that supposed to be read as an insult? > > Because i don't see why you should be insulting Tom, he made a proposal, and i > have to think he he thinks is a good idea (even if i don't agree). > > Yes his proposal is a big change, but it wouldn't be the first big change we > make, right?
No, not an insult, it's a literary reference that apparently fails to translate[*]. I was thinking Toma perhaps just wanted to get a discussion started. Ian [*] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
