--- El sáb, 5/5/12, David Faure <[email protected]> escribió: > De: David Faure <[email protected]> > On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46 > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dijous, 29 de març de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David > Faure va escriure: > > > On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals > Cid wrote: > > > > The technical point of view is not enough to > guarantee something being > > > > part > > > > of the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue > the same thing (don't want to > > > > have > > > > ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure > program only I would use. > > > > > > Hmm? This is about a crucial component for > konqueror, not about some > > > obscure program. > > > > Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial > component? > > Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than > it used to, and on > the other hand, khtml isn't catching up much with today's > web. Do you really > want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here or can > we just go on > with "treating both equally, shipping both and letting users > choose"?
Dawit proposed a patch that does not treat both of them equally. Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
