El Divendres, 15 de juny de 2012, a les 12:35:12, Dawit A va escriure: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, David Faure <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Dijous, 29 de març de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David Faure va escriure: > > > > On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > > The technical point of view is not enough to guarantee something > > > > being > > > > > > > part > > > > > of the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue the same thing (don't want > > > > > to > > > > > have > > > > > ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure program only I would use. > > > > > > > > Hmm? This is about a crucial component for konqueror, not about some > > > > obscure program. > > > > > > Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial component? > > > > Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than it used to, > > and on > > the other hand, khtml isn't catching up much with today's web. Do you > > really > > want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here, or can we just go on > > with "treating both equally, shipping both and letting users choose"? > > > > Dirk wrote: > > > The scripts are as usual in /trunk/kde-common/release, > > > and "dirk reads this" :-) > > > > Hehe. So all we need to do is ensure kwebkitpart has a KDE/4.8 branch and > > then > > add it to modules.git, right? Well at this point it might be a bit late > > for > > adding to 4.8.4 all of sudden, so maybe we want to do this for 4.9 -- but > > then > > it means someone needs to remember to add it to modules.git at the exact > > right > > moment (after the last 4.8.x release and before the first 4.9.0 alpha)? > > Hmm... would it be too late to do this now since we are on 4.9.0 beta-2 > already ?
In my opnion yes, we are past feature freeze, past message freeze, etc. Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
