On 13.07.2012 08:14, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2012 23:23:39 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dijous, 12 de juliol de 2012, a les 17:06:12, Allen Winter va
escriure:
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012 08:43:12 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > == Note 2 ==
> > There is a suggestion that every feature commit should have an
> > associated
> > bug number so it can be better tracked. Someone suggests trying
with
> > frameworks when its more ready
>
> I wonder if we could make special Big Feature "Bugs" on bugzilla
and then
> create the feature list web page from a query of those "bugs"??
>
> Each of these big features would have a milestone release number.
>
> yes.. I sorta like this idea.
>
> Thoughts?
The idea is cool, problem is always forcing people to follow it :D
random ideas to get devs motivated:
[...]
* once soft freeze is in place use git-hook to enforce that commits
need a bug
number (either it's a bugfix or it's a feature which needs to be
listed in
bugzilla)
-1 for this last part. As I see it this will only decrease the
motivation for fixing bugs as you find them since you will need to
either find the report in bugzilla or create a new report just to close
it a minute later.
/Regards
Torgny
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
