On Friday 13 July 2012 19.44.38 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Divendres, 13 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:31:35, Aurélien Gâteau va > escriure: > > Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit : > > > So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture is > > > all we wrote during the BoF itself so all written here is me trying to > > > remember what we said, if any of the presents disagrees or remembers more, > > > please do not hesitate to comment. > > > > Something which we discussed in the KDE Quality BoF and is of interest to > > the KDE Release Team is the numbering of unstable versions. > > > > Up to now we have been using 4.N.8* and 4.N.9* for alpha, beta and rc. The > > problem with those is it is difficult when you get a report on 4.8.85 to > > know if the user is running beta1, beta2, rc1 or something else. > > > > To address this we proposed the following numbering scheme: > > > > 4.N.7{1,2,3} => N+1 alpha 1, 2, 3 > > 4.N.8{1,2,3} => N+1 beta 1, 2, 3 > > 4.N.9{1,2,3} => N+1 rc 1, 2, 3 > > > > With this scheme, 4.10 alpha 1 would be 4.9.71, 4.10 beta 2 would be 4.9.82 > > This helps with remembering but breaks our "traditions", to be honest i don't > care, any other opinion?
I like the idea. /Torgny _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team