> On July 25, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would appreciate if this would go into 4.9.0.
> > 
> > Short summary for the release team:
> > * third party decorations (namely QtCurve and keramik) implemented an 
> > internal and unstable API for window decorations
> > * this API is called KDecoration*Unstable* to prevent anyone having the 
> > awesome idea to implement it
> > * we ensured that KWin and Systemsettings do not crash when an incompatible 
> > deco is found
> > * for Systemsettings there was a small bug which might lead to a crash (see 
> > referenced bug)
> > * I would like to not ship with a known crasher
> > * I hope I correctly summarized it :-)
> 
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
>     No worry, i'm back in civilization and will have usable access to my 
> system in time ;-)
>     Also, despite what Ben said, 4.9 is not yet frozen - so we *should* still 
> be permitted to just push?!
>     
>     About the crasher fixed here  - API safety is not related. Was the 
> general "make it snappier" commit.
>     
>     I introduced it by attempting to stop (long time present) leaking plugins 
> (and unloading them as well)
>     Ultimately this (and similar usage) was very likey the source of the GHNS 
> crashes as well, the preview/plugin link is not robust in this regard.

Yes, 4.9 is still not frozen, freeze starts at 23:59 UTC today (in around 9 
hours)


- Albert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105721/#review16378
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 25, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105721/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 25, 2012, 2:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kwin, Release Team and Martin Gräßlin.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> it is mandatory to manage loadPlugin() and destroyPreviousPlugin() using 
> disablePreview()
> loadPlugin() moves the present factory pointer to "old_fact" which is then 
> deleted by the succeeding destroyPreviousPlugin()
> 
> I also left a warning into the sources for our heirs ;-)
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 304026.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304026
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kwin/kcmkwin/kwindecoration/decorationmodel.cpp 3d3bb86 
>   kwin/kcmkwin/kwindecoration/preview.h 20ee869 
>   kwin/kcmkwin/kwindecoration/preview.cpp fe802c7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105721/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes, quite some.
> I'm pretty sure this is it and that a sanitation on recreate is not necessary 
> for commented reasons.
> The actual troublemaker was the BorderSizesRole implementation
> 
> 
> /me wonders whether we can now also shortcut if (lib->loaded()) - gonna try 
> that tonight.
> 
> I *may* be not be back in time (but i doubt so), so iff i've not acted on 
> call until 22:00 CEST just push this and the other one or two reviews in a 
> row before the freeze on my behalf. Thanks.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas Lübking
> 
>

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Reply via email to