El Dimecres, 13 de febrer de 2013, a les 01:21:07, Andreas K. Huettel va escriure: > Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013, 22:05:00 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote: > > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. > > > > Sorry at least to me that was not obvious. (thread started on 31. of > > January, doesn't mention minor releases, so I assumed it meant the > > upcoming release of 4.10) - all I wrote so far was explicitly for the case > > of a 4.x.0 release. > > > > > What was found > > > and reported often, is regressions from say, 4.x.2 to 4.x.3. > > > Reported not in bug reports, but more a discussion on IRC, see if anyone > > > was aware, sometimes ml, again, just checking if it was a known/accepted > > > regression. > > > > status quo is that currently the branches are basically untested. Here > > personally I would love to get more testing as I never like pushing to > > branch (let's push to master, if nobody screams in two weeks, let's > > backport). > > [shameless plug] Use Gentoo, it's trivial here since the install process is > basically the same whether git (any branch) or tarball. Our packager team > mostly runs live builds, and adapts the packaging instructions there first, > which is then copied to the release version. [/shameless plug]
I can't, as Canonical employee I am kind of obliged to use the company's distro :D Thanks for the offer though! Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
