On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > El Dimecres, 13 de febrer de 2013, a les 01:21:07, Andreas K. Huettel va > escriure: >> Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013, 22:05:00 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: >> > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote: >> > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. >> > >> > Sorry at least to me that was not obvious. (thread started on 31. of >> > January, doesn't mention minor releases, so I assumed it meant the >> > upcoming release of 4.10) - all I wrote so far was explicitly for the case >> > of a 4.x.0 release. >> > >> > > What was found >> > > and reported often, is regressions from say, 4.x.2 to 4.x.3. >> > > Reported not in bug reports, but more a discussion on IRC, see if anyone >> > > was aware, sometimes ml, again, just checking if it was a known/accepted >> > > regression. >> > >> > status quo is that currently the branches are basically untested. Here >> > personally I would love to get more testing as I never like pushing to >> > branch (let's push to master, if nobody screams in two weeks, let's >> > backport). >> >> [shameless plug] Use Gentoo, it's trivial here since the install process is >> basically the same whether git (any branch) or tarball. Our packager team >> mostly runs live builds, and adapts the packaging instructions there first, >> which is then copied to the release version. [/shameless plug] > > I can't, as Canonical employee I am kind of obliged to use the company's > distro :D
And why don't you use the Neon builds? Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
