On Thursday 22 August 2013 23:35:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dijous, 22 d'agost de 2013, a les 08:07:22, Jos Poortvliet va escriure: > > On Tuesday 20 August 2013 22:40:29 Mark wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > El Dimarts, 20 d'agost de 2013, a les 01:54:48, Albert Astals Cid va > > > > escriure: > > > >> El Dimarts, 20 d'agost de 2013, a les 01:17:18, Aaron J. Seigo va > > > > escriure: > > > >> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 00:24:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > >> > > El Dilluns, 19 d'agost de 2013, a les 22:18:26, Aaron J. Seigo va > > > >> > > > >> escriure: > > > >> > > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 22:14:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > >> > > > > There will be a 4.13? Most probably. > > > >> > > > > Will it be in 2014? For sure > > > >> > > > > Which month? Noone knows, you can probably guess it'll be > > > >> > > > > between > > > >> > > > > Q2 > > > >> > > > > and > > > >> > > > > Q3 > > > >> > > > > since Q1 would mean <= 3 months of development and Q4 would > > > >> > > > > mean > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >= > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > 10 > > > >> > > > > months. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > unless we change the development cycle, which has not yet been > > > >> > > > done, > > > >> > > > which > > > >> > > > month will 4.13 be in? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Are you disagreeing with the 4.12 schedule? > > > >> > > > > >> > No; however, on > > > >> > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.12_Release_Schedule it > > > >> > says > > > >> > “THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL YET” four times right at the top. I was under > > > >> > the > > > >> > impression that it was still being discussed and wasn’t ... you > > > >> > know > > > >> > .. > > > >> > official yet. > > > >> > > > >> It will be official when i get tired of waiting for people to oppose > > > >> to > > > >> it. > > > >> If it makes you happier, I can declare it official now. > > > > > > > > There you go. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Albert > > > >> > > > >> Well, not now, i'm going to sleep now. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> > > > >> Albert > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> release-team mailing list > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > release-team mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > > > > > > What you just did means that KDE SC 4.12 will in fact be a 5 month > > > release cycle. Earlier there was talk about outlining the future > > > releases. That blog/news item is probably going to have to take the > > > new 5 month cycle into account. > > > > Yes. What about this then: > > ======= > > KDE frameworks 5 preview 1 December 2013 > > KDE frameworks 5 release 1st half 2014 > > KDE Workspaces 4.11 is last release (LTS) > > KDE Workspaces 2.0 preview 1st half 2014 > > KDE Workspaces 2.0 release 2nd half 2014 > > KDE Applications 4.12 December 18 2013 > > KDE Applications 4.13 June 2014 > > 4.12 and 4.13 will include kdelibs too (that have been almost-frozen for a > while but we still increase its version number on each release) > > Also we don't have a date for 4.13. > > It may well be May or July or even March or August since we haven't started > planning for it and we can't do it since at Akademy it was agreed we'd do a > shorter cycle (4.12) and then evaluate if that had worked or not, and to > evaluate it, we have to let 4.12 happen. > > So please be very clear June is a guessed month from your side since the > Release Team has not started discussing about it.
"As with any schedule for a major technological transition, please note that the above is subject to change." Is that enough? Please note, as Aaron already said, that it is better to have a plan now and change it later than to have no plan at all. > Cheers, > Albert > > > As with any schedule for a major technological transition, please note > > that > > the above is subject to change. > > ========== > > > > If this is OK then we'll communicate it this way. > > > > > I like this new shorter cycle! > > > _______________________________________________ > > > release-team mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
