On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 16:12:50 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 21 May 2014 11:28:45 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:17:15 Kevin Ottens wrote: ... > > > This type of branch got actually > > > discussed before making the initial proposal, it's not that we don't > > > like > > > the idea at all, it's that we don't feel confident to make it work at > > > that > > > point in time. > > > > Even with a single stable branch owner? > > Yes, that's the exact option we thought about, but you need someone willing > to do the job.
shouldn't in theory each library in frameworks have a maintainer, who is responsible for that library, and wouldn't this be the obvious person who maintains also the stable branch of the library ? Alex _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
