On Sun, October 12, 2014 00:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > once after CHANGELOG: > I'm not against an empty CHANGELOG: meaning the tool has to use the title, > but i'd still want to have the possibility to have a separate line, my > titles are usually "more geeky" and I would not want them in a public > consumption changelog so i'd have to craft something more user-friendly in > the CHANGELOG: entry. > > What do others think?
I think allowing CHANGELOG: to have a more descriptive title, while falling back to the commit title if CHANGELOG: is left blank, makes perfect sense and is a good idea. Regards, - Michael Pyne _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
