On Sunday, October 12, 2014 19:04:54 Michael Pyne wrote: > On Sun, October 12, 2014 00:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > once after CHANGELOG: > > I'm not against an empty CHANGELOG: meaning the tool has to use the title, > > but i'd still want to have the possibility to have a separate line, my > > titles are usually "more geeky" and I would not want them in a public > > consumption changelog so i'd have to craft something more user-friendly in > > the CHANGELOG: entry. > > > > > > > > What do others think? > > I think allowing CHANGELOG: to have a more descriptive title, while falling > back to the commit title if CHANGELOG: is left blank, makes perfect sense > and is a good idea.
Was thinking the same. It feels silly having to repeat a perfectly crafted commit message/title, but that's not always very clear to end-users (which the changelog is really for). I like that fallback solution. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
