2015-06-18 0:01 GMT+03:00 Kevin Ottens <[email protected]>: > Bear with me I'll be partly acting from memory here... let's see something > like: > 1) KF5 releases are numbered YYYY.MM; > 2) Individual frameworks are numbered 5.N, N being incremented only if > there's been commits since the last KF5 release; > > [*] Note that IMO, that tuning should not involve going toward 5.N.M version > scheme. The 5.N only scheme was intentional and debated quite a bit already. > It's intentional to have a combination of very short cycles and feature + > bugfix on each releases. Packagers were skeptic about it but it's been proven > to work now.
Hi Kevin, 5.N.M numbering (or even X.N.M) is what Christian requested in the first place. Probing question: If I translate one string in kcoreaddons5_qt.po into Belarusian language, should we bump and release a new version of KCoreAddons because of that? -- Alexander Potashev _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
