On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Potashev <[email protected]> wrote: > 2015-06-18 0:01 GMT+03:00 Kevin Ottens <[email protected]>: >> Bear with me I'll be partly acting from memory here... let's see something >> like: >> 1) KF5 releases are numbered YYYY.MM; >> 2) Individual frameworks are numbered 5.N, N being incremented only if >> there's been commits since the last KF5 release; >> >> [*] Note that IMO, that tuning should not involve going toward 5.N.M version >> scheme. The 5.N only scheme was intentional and debated quite a bit already. >> It's intentional to have a combination of very short cycles and feature + >> bugfix on each releases. Packagers were skeptic about it but it's been proven >> to work now. > > Hi Kevin, > > 5.N.M numbering (or even X.N.M) is what Christian requested in the first > place. > > Probing question: If I translate one string in kcoreaddons5_qt.po into > Belarusian language, should we bump and release a new version of > KCoreAddons because of that?
At the moment, we're updating the version regardless you have a new string. Aleix _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
