On Mon, Jul 3, 2017, at 05:21 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Monday, 3 July 2017 17:15:19 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > > the phab task is marked private. > > > > on a general note I do not think this was ever discussed or agreed > > upon and makes no sense (how the heck is a playground project meant to > > evolve if it can't do bloody pre releases...). > > > > making production releases from playground is not advisable because > > a) playground was not peer-reviewed through kdereview and > > b) for reasons I do not know playground projects cannot have stable > > translations, so you couldn't do maintenance releases afterwards > > without jumping through hoops to retain > > Because playground is not supposed to have production releases, as you > wrote above, so we never tracked or enabled translations for playground. It's > part of the workflow.
I'm not looking for a "production release", I just need to release my code. I thought that's what the unstable prefix is about. > > > > even so there's plenty of stuff releasing from playground, which I'll > > argue is their business. just at a glance I am seeing like 10 projects > > that have production releases but live in playground. > > Can you please list it, so we can fix them instead of keeping this a > self- > fulfilling prophecy? > > > > whoever came up with this bullshit should stop putting stones in > > people's way and publish the tarballs. releasing tarballs is enough of > > a chore as it is. > > I beg to disagree. > You are free to release pre-production from playground. When you start > releasing stable stuff, you are shouting that you are not *play*ground > anymore. Please clarify how to do that. Thanks, Christiain
