On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, 3 July 2017 17:15:19 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: >> the phab task is marked private. >> >> on a general note I do not think this was ever discussed or agreed >> upon and makes no sense (how the heck is a playground project meant to >> evolve if it can't do bloody pre releases...). >> >> making production releases from playground is not advisable because >> a) playground was not peer-reviewed through kdereview and >> b) for reasons I do not know playground projects cannot have stable >> translations, so you couldn't do maintenance releases afterwards >> without jumping through hoops to retain > > Because playground is not supposed to have production releases, as you wrote > above, so we never tracked or enabled translations for playground. It's part > of the workflow.
Software which lives in Extragear/Applications/Frameworks/Plasma should also not be depending on Playground software as well. > > >> >> even so there's plenty of stuff releasing from playground, which I'll >> argue is their business. just at a glance I am seeing like 10 projects >> that have production releases but live in playground. > > Can you please list it, so we can fix them instead of keeping this a self- > fulfilling prophecy? I'd like to see that list as well. I see pretty much all the releases which get made and i'm reasonably certain most playground software which has been doing active releases has now moved to Extragear. > > >> whoever came up with this bullshit should stop putting stones in >> people's way and publish the tarballs. releasing tarballs is enough of >> a chore as it is. > > I beg to disagree. > You are free to release pre-production from playground. When you start > releasing stable stuff, you are shouting that you are not *play*ground > anymore. > > -- > Luigi Cheers, Ben
