On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 11:55:24 CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: > >>> I was the one who made that decision > >> > >> Cool > >> > >> You are not my supervisor. > > > > Please bear in mind you were the one (if my memory is correct) who > > pushed for everyone to include *.asc signatures with every released > > tarball > > You mean the one I *discussed* with the plasma release manager? Then > *announced* our *intention* on this very mailing list inviting others > to follow suit. Then proceeded to argue why we need it and why we need > it the way we intend to do it. Then helped figure out a workflow that > will work for how frameworks and apps are released. > > No, I will not have this bullshit. > > Had you had a problem with how the tarball signing implementation went > down, then you would have been welcome to shout at me for being a > douchebag THEN AND THERE. You even replied to the friggin tarball > signing thread. You could literally have thrown in a PS: harald you > suck. You did not. You absolutely do not get to defend your shady > background rule-making crap this way.
And this is not the point. The point was this sentence: - "releasing tarballs is enough of a chore as it is." Ben described that the requirements for the release are not heavey at all, let me quote the part that you cut out from the answer: On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 09:41:56 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > In terms of the "chore" of releasing tarballs, the only part we > require is two things which aren't exactly time consuming: upload to > incoming, create ticket with the destination and a list of files and > hashes. Translated this means: the process is not complicated on the sysadmin side. The biggest requirement (without any judgement about it, it was just a description of it) is the signing process, added recently. So I suggest to calm down, probably open up the ticket at the beginning of the discussion to show everyone what was written there. And calm down again, and re-read the code of conduct. -- Luigi