On Jan 29, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 11.45.56, Knoll Lars wrote: >> Yeah, let's get it into 5.0.1 if possible. The patch is very safe, I can't >> see how including it could cause issues in the release process. > > Lars, please also comment on whether you think this should be in. Stephen > isn't sure and, to be honest, neither am I. We're looking for opinions. I thought a bit more about it, and now think we should simply go for 5.1. It's not the end of the world to have a method missing in 5.0 that's there in 4.8 and we fix it again in 5.1. It's simply a bug. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Releasing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/releasing
