On the other hand, I don't suppose President Zachary Taylor would have described his party as the Whiggish Party. Thus the name of a party need not be an adjective.
And note that for Republicans, Socialists, Libertarians, etc. the same word describes the party and a member of it (e.g., a member of the Republican Party is a Republican). Thus the Democratic Party seems to want special treatment, claiming the right to have its members known as Democrats rather than Democratics. :-) Mark Scarberry Pepperdine -----Original Message----- From: Samuel V To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Sent: 7/20/2005 12:10 PM Subject: Re: George Washington adding "under God" to the Presidential oath And to the Libertars and Socials as well. On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member > of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the Republic > Party! > > Cheers and Blessings to Democrat and Republic listmembers alike, Rick Duncan > _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
