All law is inescapably "religious," our own Western law being based on the 
Christian Church/Bible. See, please, among other books, Harold Berman's 2-vol 
work "Law And Revolution." John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com; Recovering 
Republican... 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 17 May 2007 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Lofton / Falwell Not Preacher He SHOULD Have Been


I wish that it were clear that there is a sharp line dividing the two.
There is, after all, a powerful dynamic relation between law and
morality, as there is between law and psychology, law and theology, and
any number of other relevant and germane factors and considerations.

Falwell obviously sought to link law and morality.  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:40 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Lofton / Falwell Not Preacher He SHOULD Have Been


    A discussion of Falwell's role in the development of Religion
Clauses law is surely entirely on-topic.  A discussion of whether
Falwell acted in sad or sinful ways under one's own theological view
(however sincere or well-reasoned) of what behavior is sad or sinful
strikes me as no more on-topic than a discussion of whether, say,
Justices Brennan or Blackmun acted in sad or sinful ways.

    Eugene

> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/17/07 9:01 AM >>>
>  
>  
> In a message dated 5/16/2007 9:59:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight 
> Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Please remember that this is a list devoted to the law of 
> government and religion -- not on whether some people 
> (recently dead or  otherwise) acted in sad or sinful ways, 
> except insofar as that pretty  closely connects to the law of 
> government and religion.
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         I am incredulous  that an open  discussion of one of 
> the most important operatives in  religion and 
> constitutionalism in the last three decades should be 
> inappropriate  on this List. Of course, this is Eugene's List 
> and therefore I will respect his  wishes. But I could not 
> disagree more with his sense of relevance or  appropriateness 
> in this matter.
>  
> Bobby
> 
> Robert Justin Lipkin
> Professor of Law
> Widener  University School of Law
> Delaware
> 
> Ratio  Juris
> , Contributor: _  http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/_
> (http://ratiojuris.blogspot.com/)
> Essentially Contested  America, Editor: 
> _http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/_
> (http://www.essentiallycontestedamerica.org/) 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's free at 
> http://www.aol.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to [email protected] To 
> subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
> 
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be 
> viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read 
> messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; 
> and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
> messages to others.
> 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly
or wrongly) forward the messages to others.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from 
AOL at AOL.com.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to