May I respectfully suggest that one difference between Lincoln and perhaps) all 
of his successors is that he was a profoundly serious man who was not using 
religion for crassly instrumental low-political purposes.

Sandy

________________________________

From: [email protected] 
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics 
Sent: Fri Mar 27 11:18:32 2009
Subject: RE: Using religion for government purposes 


It seems to me that no endorsement theory can be considered credible if it 
cannot be squared with the powerful invocation of religious ideas in Lincoln's 
Second Inaugural Address. Somehow it seems wrong to describe what Lincoln did 
as "using" religion. Perhaps it would be better to say that the religious ideas 
(or God) used Lincoln. Here it is, quotations from the Bible and all (from 
bartleby.com/124/pres32.html):
 
 
Fellow-Countrymen: 

  AT this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is 
less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a 
statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and 
proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations 
have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest 
which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, 
little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all 
else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I 
trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the 
future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.     1   
  On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were 
anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to 
avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, 
devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the 
city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide 
effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make 
war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather 
than let it perish, and the war came.        2      
  One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed 
generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These 
slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this 
interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and 
extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the 
Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to 
restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war 
the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither 
anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the 
conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result 
less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same 
God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any 
men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the 
sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The 
prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. 
The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for 
it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense 
cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses 
which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued 
through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both 
North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense 
came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which 
the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, 
fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. 
Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's 
two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every 
drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the 
sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the 
judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."   3      
  With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as 
God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, 
to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle 
and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a 
just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.   
 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to