But would the amendment actually apply to judicial enforcement of
religious arbitrations -- or arbitrations under the law of foreign countries --
so long as the court itself was only applying secular American law and not
religious or foreign law?
Eugene
> -----Original Message-----
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
> boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Rassbach
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:05 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: TRO against Oklahoma "no use of Sharia Law"
>
> In the video Prof. Helfand is apparently quoting, Rep. Duncan refers to
> religious arbitration immediately before he says the quoted language:
>
> http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2010/11/religious-arbitration-
> and-the-new-multiculturalism.html
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
