I was talking about the facts of how these cases are litigated. I represent many victims in numerous cases around the country on the First Am and RFRA issues. The RCC and LDS on particular push the religious freedom claims hard in such cases. Sometimes together
Gibson v Brewer out of Missouri Is a good case to start with Marci On Jun 14, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Arthur Spitzer <artspit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Marci - I don't believe you've stated the facts of a single case. I'd say the > same thing if you were a man. > Art > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Marci Hamilton <hamilto...@aol.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure why stating the facts in these cases is "rhetoric" I sincerely > hope it is not because a woman is pointing out the facts rather than a man. > This last statement also is not rhetoric but an honest observation. > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; > people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) > forward the messages to others.
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
