From what I understand, think the health arguments for
circumcision are substantial, and, as I've noted before, to the extent that
parents are making a medical choice in favor of circumcision, I think it makes
sense to defer to their judgment, just as it does for other medical choices.
Likewise, I'm inclined to say that if there was reason to think (though also
reason to doubt) that circumcision would enhance sexual function, parents could
also reasonable choose that as a medical matter.
The interesting question, I think, is how we should resolve the
matter if (1) the medical consensus comes to be that there was no medical
benefit of circumcision and no sexual function benefits, but (2) there comes to
be no consensus on whether there is a sexual function cost. My inclination
would be to say that the uncertainty should not be resolved in favor of
parental choice, but rather resolved in favor of patient choice: the principle
that - absent medical need - practically irreversible and potentially harmful
surgery should not be undertaken without the actual consent of the adult
subject of the surgery.
Eugene
Eric Rassbach writes:
> I am not sure that you can even rely on a claim that the sexual function was
> necessarily reduced; I know that some proponents of circumcision claim that
> circumcision actually enhances sexual function. Would you agree that if the
> evidence on that point is ambiguous or equivocal, then circumcision falls
> within the realm of things that parents can decide? That is reinforced by the
> fact that there are health reasons offered for circumcision; if those
> rationales
> are true (or perhaps just plausible?) then it is less like having an ear cut
> off
> and more like having an unsightly mole excised or an extra toe removed,
> both of which are easier at a younger age.
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
