I have. My point is your condemnation is not compelling to me when we disagree on a either more moderate or almost identical bill (depending on how Hobby Lobby comes out).
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:55 PM, <hamilto...@aol.com> wrote: > Have you read anything I've written for the last 20 years? > > > Marci A. Hamilton > Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law > Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law > Yeshiva University > 55 Fifth Avenue > New York, NY 10003 > (212) 790-0215 > http://sol-reform.com > <https://www.facebook.com/professormarciahamilton?fref=ts> > <https://twitter.com/marci_hamilton> > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Worley <mwor...@byulaw.net> > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu> > Sent: Tue, Feb 25, 2014 8:47 pm > Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Kansas/Arizona statutes protecting for-profit > businesses > > Would you say the Federal RFRA is egregious, Marci? > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Marci Hamilton <hamilto...@aol.com>wrote: > >> I have read them and both are egregious. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 25, 2014, at 6:15 PM, "Scarberry, Mark" < >> mark.scarbe...@pepperdine.edu> wrote: >> >> The Arizona bill and the Kansas bill are very different. I don't have >> time right now to discuss this further, but all you have to do is to read >> the bills. If you do, you will see that the arguments equating the two are >> simply and egregiously wrong. I hope no one will comment in any strong way >> without actually reading them. >> >> Mark >> >> Mark S. Scarberry >> Professor of Law >> Pepperdine Univ. School of Law >> >> >> >> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [ >> mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu<religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>] >> *On Behalf Of *Greg Hamilton >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:55 PM >> *To:* mich...@californialaw.org; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics >> *Subject:* RE: Subject: Re: Kansas/Arizona statutes protecting >> for-profit businesses >> >> ...and Alan has been championing this bill on the spot at the Arizona >> capitol. Sigh. I have fought him over it when he tried to push me into >> supporting the Idaho bill which was just as egregious as the Arizona bill, >> but perhaps more targeted. >> >> Gregory W. Hamilton, President >> Northwest Religious Liberty Association >> 5709 N. 20th Street >> Ridgefield, WA 98642 >> Office: (360) 857-7040 >> Website: www.nrla.com >> >> <image001.jpg> <http://www.nrla.com/> >> >> *Championing Religious Freedom and Human Rights for All People of Faith* >> >> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [ >> mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu<religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>] >> *On Behalf Of *Michael Peabody >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:38 PM >> *To:* religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu >> *Subject:* Subject: Re: Kansas/Arizona statutes protecting for-profit >> businesses >> >> After reading the legislation, it's amazing how broadly it is drafted. >> It would seem to not only include permitting discrimination on the basis of >> sexual orientation or marital status, but also on the basis of religion. >> It would make it very easy for any business with a religious inkling to >> refuse to accommodate the religious exercise of employees, or even >> terminate them on the basis of religious differences. >> >> The Hobby Lobby case may go a long way in showing what rights employers >> have, and it seems to be part of a general strike against the application >> of the Bill of Rights to the states (14th Amendment). >> >> Any time the principle argument in favor of a potentially dangerous law >> is, "What's the worse that can happen?" I think there's reason to get >> really nervous. >> >> There is probably an answer for those who don't want to violate their >> religious conscience by accommodating those members of protected classes >> that disagree with them, but this legislation is not it. >> >> Michael D. Peabody, Esq. >> Editor >> ReligiousLiberty.TV >> http://www.religiousliberty.tv >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see >> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw >> >> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as >> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are >> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or >> wrongly) forward the messages to others. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see >> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw >> >> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as >> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are >> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or >> wrongly) forward the messages to others. >> > > > > -- > Michael Worley > BYU Law School, Class of 2014 > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. > Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can > read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the > messages to others. > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. > -- Michael Worley BYU Law School, Class of 2014
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.