On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:08:13 -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > >Remote X is very important, and very widely used.
Not if you agree with the 1% figure. There is no conceivable way in which one can interpret 1% as "very widely used". >> Should X continue with a model that makes improvements to >> the common case very slow/difficult so that the rare case >> preforms okay? > >Yes. This is boneheaded. Please note that no one has suggested BREAKING the remote case. The suggestion, rather, is to improve the 99% case at the expense of slightly reduced performance for the 1%. That is an absolutely sensible and supportable tactic. In Spock's words, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few." -- - Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. _______________________________________________ Render mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/render
