> FreeType 2 should match FreeType 1 essentiall pixel-for-pixel; certainly
> the quality I've seen with FreeType 2 rasterizer (given high quality
> fonts) is at least as good as anything I've seen elsewhere.

I just recompiled everything with GCC 2.95.3, and the problem is still there. 
It seems to be a Freetype thing, so I'll stop bothering you about it. Here's 
my config, though, if you're interested:

#define  TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER

That was the only line i changed in ../include/freetype/config/ftoption.h

I attached a bzip2'ed XPM screenshot of the ftview demo of both FT-1.3.1 
(right side) and FT-2.0.5 (left side). Each of the four Xmag screens goes 
with the Freetype demo right above it. Notice the extra pixel in the inside 
of the 'D' on Freetype2 and the weirdness on the lower part of the '/'. 

Attachment: fonts.xpm.bz2
Description: Screenshot

Reply via email to