Re: [Repeater-Builder] quick question

Sat, 08 Nov 2003 08:19:19 -0800

The larger can should also handle more power and be easier to tune.
Paul, kb9wlc

ian wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just checking definately less loss and better rejection of unwanted signals
and a clearer signal through the tin/can
correct
thanks ian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert D. Mantell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] quick question


> Ian,
>
> Not only does the loss improve, but the major pick up is higher Q,
> translating into
> a narrower bandpass - a consummation devoutly to be wished I hope you
> used the word "tin" in place of "can"
>
> Bob - W3TGG
>
> ian wells wrote:
>
> >Hi guys
> >just a quick question
> >is it better to use a 6 inch cavity tin instead of a 4 inch cavity tin
> >filter on 477 mhz (ie less loss )
> >thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>







Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Reply via email to