Re: [Repeater-Builder] quick question

[ian wells]

thanks paul Thank you Ian Wells Kerinvale Comaudio mail service 1017, Biloela,4715. www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Guello To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 2:19 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] quick question The larger can should also handle more power and be easier to tune. Paul, kb9wlc ian wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: just checking definately less loss and better rejection of unwanted signals and a clearer signal through the tin/can correct thanks ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert D. Mantell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] quick question > Ian, > > Not only does the loss improve, but the major pick up is higher Q, > translating into > a narrower bandpass - a consummation devoutly to be wished I hope you > used the word "tin" in place of "can" > > Bob - W3TGG > > ian wells wrote: > > >Hi guys > >just a quick question > >is it better to use a 6 inch cavity tin instead of a 4 inch cavity tin > >filter on 477 mhz (ie less loss ) > >thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.