Hmmmm--   what about the case where your single shielded cable runs 
past a high power paging antenna, or your own repeater tx antenna?  
Seems that leakage INTO your receive antenna coax could be a 
consideration here.  

About RG213, I've witnessed desense in a duplex situation when using 
this cable while it is being flexed.....  Bottom line-- using solid 
shield coax is almost never a bad choice.

Laryn K8TVZ

--- In [email protected], Dan Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Why do you believe that double shielded cable is
> necessary for an antenna run? What are you trying to
> keep the signal out of?
> Inter-cabling within the cabinet needs to be double
> shielded to prevent interaction between the TX and RX
> portions, but once those signals are merged at the
> output of the duplexer they are both on the same
> feedline anyway and double shielding is expensive and
> unnecessary.
> For short antenns runs, RG213 is actually an excellent
> choice. 
> The only exception to this is if there is no duplexer
> being used and the repeater is operating on split
> antennas with parallel feedline runs, then 100%
> shielding is necessary. Under these circumstances
> LDM400 or 9913 would be a good choice if heliax is not
> available affordably since the cables are not being
> used in a duplex setting.
> 
> Dan N8DJP
> 
> 
> 
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:38:12 -0500
>    From: Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Static / desense problems
> 
> Gene Colson wrote:
> 
> > And I am going to once again proclaim that with
> proper 
> connectors, LMR 400 
> > is as good as it gets.No more noisy that RG213. I am
> 
> using it on 900 , 440 
> > and VHF duplexers and assure you , there are no
> problems,
> > Gene W7UVH
> > 
> 
> Of course not-RG213 is unsuitable for duplex as well,
> as it 
> is NOT 
> double shielded!!! Or do you mean RG-214, which IS 
> double-shielded?
> And Andrews LDFwhatever-50 is as good as it gets for 
> feedline for ANY 
> application!!!!! (well, maybe a few exceptions, like
> if you 
> need 
> radiating feedline, or plenum-rated...)
> 
> -- 
> Jim
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree




 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to