This will be for as fixed application as an interconnect cable for a 8 channel receiver multicoupler which I have successfully crafted.
>From: Eric Lemmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To:
[email protected]
>To:
[email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RG-142 cable assembly
>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:26:08 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Originating-IP: 207.154.64.11
>Received: from n9.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.93]) by mc6-f8.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:26:56 -0800
>Received: from [66.218.67.198] by n9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Nov 2003 21:26:23 -0000
>Received: (qmail 7885 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2003 21:26:22 -0000
>Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Nov 2003 21:26:22 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO red.impulse.net) (207.154.64.11) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2003 21:26:22 -0000
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by red.impulse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CC91D1A9Bfor
; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:26:21 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from red.impulse.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (red.impulse.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 84445-01-90 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:26:20 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from impulse.net (unknown [207.154.71.158])by red.impulse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525861D1C6Afor ; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:26:05 -0800 (PST)
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEJBvMObtFW3WZDP07glkCW
>X-eGroups-Return: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Apparently-To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD479 (Win98; U)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at impulse.net
>X-eGroups-From: Eric Lemmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Yahoo-Profile: wb6fly
>Mailing-List: list [email protected]; contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Unsubscribe:
>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2003 21:26:56.0103 (UTC) FILETIME=[31EA0770:01C3ABBF]
>
>Dave,
>
>If this cable is going into a more or less permanent installation,
>RG-142/U should be okay- assuming that you specified that type of cable
>because you need the double shields.
>
>But, if you need this cable for bench use or for an application that may
>move or vibrate, perhaps RG-400/U is a better choice. RG-142/U has a
>solid steel center conductor that conducts well at high frequencies
>because it has a silver plating, but it can develop fatigue fractures
>over time and cause noise problems. RG-400/U is identical to RG-142/U
>in both appearance and specifications, except that its center conductor
>is stranded and is made of silver-plated copper. The RG-400/U costs
>perhaps 5% more than RG-142/U, and it uses the same connectors.
>
>73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
>Dave wrote:
> >
> > Looking for a RG-142 cable assembly, terminated BNC male on one end and N-male on the other...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
From Beethoven to the Rolling Stones, your favorite music is always playing on MSN Radio Plus. No ads, no talk. Trial month FREE!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
