|
Skipp and group,
Years ago back in the 60's when we planned our Amateur 420-450 band we
probably were considered a "rural" area. Now we have every commercial two
way frequency, FM and TV Broadcast and even the 2 Mtr and 440 Amateur bands
are full with transmitters and they are at multiple repeater sites.
Even today, my 449.500- repeater is currently co-located with a
broadcasters 450.5125+ repeater at an 8800 Ft site and they both work
fine. They are on separate DB408 antennas. This is at a site that uses
every frequency known to the broadcast, 2 way and paging world. Several other
Ham repeaters are located on this mountain. By the way, all of the broadcasters
that I know of have repeaters that transmit in the low end of 450 Mhz. I
thought that this was the same all over the country. Maybe this is different in
your area.
All I am trying to say is that with the Broadcasters repeaters transmitting
near the low end of 450 Mhz, it seems prudent that the amateur repeaters
would want some frequency isolation from them especially at a co-located site
and would want to use a low input frequency for their repeaters. It just make
sense! I guess your local bandplan will take precident in how you operate with
either a low input or high input. Our Ham repeaters use top quality Cavities, Duplexers, Combiners where
needed, Heliax cables and rugged antennas to exist in the high RF
environment.
Over the years, I have built and managed Commercial Repeater
sites that have had hundreds of repeaters which included
138-174, 450-470, 806-866, 900 mhz repeaters and oh yeah that 940.225 Mhz
Skytel pager running 500 watts output. We even had a full power CH 14 TV
transmitter on site! Life gets real interesting in this
environment. Combiners and antenna management are a must in high RF
environments!
By the way, all we had back many years ago were GE mobiles
and repeaters so we just bought the crystals for the Ham frequencies we wanted
to operate on.
Thanks and 73's
John, K7JL
Message:
5
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:32:40 -0000 From: "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 440 - 450 Low in High Out Repeaters Hello Sailors, As I replied direct to John, the "trend setters" statement was made tongue in cheek. His reasons for their bandplan make sense in rural areas. When you get into large metro areas, all the rules go out the window at busy mountain tops and repeater sites. You just can't hide from that nearby 1/4kw paging transmitter... Receiver distribution and transmit combiner systems become a lot of science, experience, budget management and magic with mirrors. Cheers
Skipp Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- [Repeater-Builder] 440 - 450 Low in High Out Repeaters John Lloyd
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 - 450 Low in High Out Rep... XE2SI
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 450 Low in High Out Rep... John Lloyd
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 450 Low in High Out... skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 450 Low in ... Dave Fortenberry
- [Repeater-Builder] 6 meter beacon... skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] 6 meter beac... Dave Fortenberry
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 450 Low in ... Neil McKie
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 450 Low... Tad Danley
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 45... Neil McKie
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 - 45... Kevin Custer
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 440 ... mch
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ... Tad Danley

