There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good
equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group.
"Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> russ wrote:
>
> > THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT ADMITT.
> > The way the mother "M" keeps down the desence
> > is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so clean I do
> > not know how they do it.
> > I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell had a
> > Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this pair
and
> > he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that (HE
> > SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of the
> > Maggiore.
> >
> > Very best of 73,
> > Russ, W3CH
> > Trustee W3PS/r
> >
>
> This guys turning into a bit of a troll.
> Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one at a
> site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the
> owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in to
> pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again.
>
> --
> Jim Barbour
> WD8CHL
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
