THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. 73 Russ.
On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH ----- Original Message ----- From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] > Mastr II and Micor not ok to use in part 90?!?!?!?!? > Says who? > > "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gee I was work at ATC when the memo came down to remove all Master 2 RCA > > and Micores if they where not type accepted for the service they had listed > > on the paper work. I did not know untill that time that they where not ok > to > > use for part 95 GMRS or part 90 Business. Yes you find a bad Maggiore every > > once in a while. The old one where bad. I have not seen any of the new ones > > bad. I am sure there out there. Just like the stuff you are talking about > > has there share of bad ones. We could go back and forth and you just takes > > up time. Lots of time. Hey I am an old tube man my self. I alway thought a > > tube was cleaner. I till beleve that but yet we build new TV stuff that is > > very high power and not tube. I started my 1st job at a 500 watt day time > > only omni with a Gates transmitter. BUT! You know they (and I) have come a > > long way. > > You realy have to look a round. As I have stated time and time again the > > early Maggiore stuff was crap. I had one of the 1st ones that Frank build > > and it was junk. I replaced it with a Micore that ran well for years. It > > died one winter night and I bought one of the new ones from Maggioe as a > > temp replacement. I sold the Micore and started replacing all the rest of > my > > old stuff with Maggiore and never looked back. As I said come on out pick a > > site. I will let you go see a Maggiore in HIGH Rf areas or in the sticks. I > > get suppy any test equment you mite need ot bring your own. I was suprezed > > at 1st but they work well and will follow an HT or mobile in to the noise > > that outhers even with a pre-amp would not. The offer is open. I would love > > to give you a tour. > > Have a great day! > > Very best of 73, > > Russ, W3CH > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with > COR]] > > > > > > > > > > There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good > > > > equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. > > > > > > > > "Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > russ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > THE BELOW IS SOMTHING THAT A LOT OF US KNOW AND SOME WILL NOT > > ADMITT. > > > > > > The way the mother "M" keeps down the desence > > > > > > is to not have a lot of sencitive but the Maggiore (new) is so > clean > > I > > > do > > > > > > not know how they do it. > > > > > > I have seen what you are talking about at some of our sites. Fell > > had > > > a > > > > > > Micore and the receiver would shut. We lent him a maggiore on this > > > pair > > > > and > > > > > > he loves it and his users love it. He fixed up a Mater Two and that > > > (HE > > > > > > SAID) works better but the users like the sound and the range of > the > > > > > > Maggiore. > > > > > > > > > > > > Very best of 73, > > > > > > Russ, W3CH > > > > > > Trustee W3PS/r > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This guys turning into a bit of a troll. > > > > > Maggiore's are dirty, unreliable, broad as a barn, and if I saw one > at > > a > > > > > site I was at, I'd be demanding it be removed. If I was the > > > > > owner/manager of the site, I'd unplug it and tell whoever put it in > to > > > > > pick it up outa the trash bin, and don't darken my door again. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Jim Barbour > > > > > WD8CHL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
