This is very true! If you like LTR they are ok. They just came out with an APCO system and I under stand they will have 38 new models this year. I saw a demo at a show it did not look bad but they will have to be out for a while. I have a Kenwood TK-8150 in my SUV it has LTR (work) HAm and GMRS all in the same radio. Neat radio with a remote (small) control head. Of corse I have a Kenwood 742 tri band ham rig and a Icom-706 mark two G. I have a Maxtrac for 927 ham that is getting replaced with a Spectra soon I hope. The bottom line is the new Kenwood Systems stuff is real good. BTW it is not cheap. You get what you pay for. <smile>
Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]] > brent wrote: > > > AGREED > > > > PRICE !!! save money = more radio(s) > > > > to me as long as they work to my needs they are all great ! ! Tennessee H.P > > went to Kenwood also..had a great package deal. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Neil McKie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:08 PM > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver > > with COR]]]] > > > > > > > >> In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to > >> Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. > >> > >> Neil - WA6KLA > >> > >> > > Actually, Kenwood commercial equipment from the last 10-15 years is on a > par with any other conventional (non-trunked) equipment out there. I'd > put a Kenwood up against an _equivalent_ Motorola any day. > > -- > Jim Barbour > WD8CHL > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
