Well I am on my Lap top and it has Auto Fix. I can't fine where to turn it off. The big problem is it looks good till I send it. Then after it goes off the sreen it fixes what it does not like. 73 Russ
----- Original Message ----- From: "mch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]] > Russ, you need to get hold of a spell checker. :-) > > (or not have it automatically 'fix' all the things it thinks is wrong.) > > Joe M. > > russ wrote: > > > > The problem was not price. In fact the Kenwood Systems stuff was more money. > > When Motorola closed it's service (Factory) state wide service of there > > units went away. 2nd was the fact that the new Motorola stuff was not as > > good as the older Micros. Ever since mother "M" stopped building radio's in > > the US they went down the tubes. They (the State)compared Johnson, (there > > number 2 Joyce) Motorola, Midland, MA Com. For state wide support and less > > break downs then any of the above. It was Kenwood systems. in fact in the > > last year the break down rate is less the 1% with Kenwood Systems. I have a > > copy of the full report form the state if you would like a copy. Neat > > reading. The state of PA went with MA/Com for there state wide system for > > many of the same reasons. Add one thing Kenwood systems was two Million > > higher then MA/Com. This seems to be going on all over. There was a time > > when Motorola was king. But in the pass few year they have lost more > > contracts then they ever have. > > So that is the answer to the why question. > > > > Very best. > > Russ, W3CH > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Neil McKie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:08 PM > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver > > with COR]]]] > > > > > > > > In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to > > > Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. > > > > > > Neil - WA6KLA > > > > > > > > > russ wrote: > > > > > > > > I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about > > > > Motorola in the early years. Maggiore was the same in the early > > > > years. If it was build after Paul statrted building them and since > > > > 1997 or so they did a 100% turn around. Ever wonder why the State > > > > police in GA stoped useing Motorola and went to Kenwood systems? > > > > Any way you are beatting a dead horse. Any way like you said if the > > > > user likes it it is fine. But like one guy said on the list today. > > > > He has used evey thing and they all have there place. Please go > > > > look up the Part 90. It thourgh me for a loop. Part 95 GMRS I guess > > > > It did not but the Part 90 did. I see so much of it out there. Any > > > > way. Have a great day and a good night. > > > > 73, > > > > Russ, W3CH > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz > > > > Receiver with COR]]]] > > > > > > > > > I'll have to check that about part 90!! > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy then I guess that is > > > > > all that matters. There are many that have had bad experiences > > > > > with that equipment. This reminds me of a article in the newspaper > > > > > the other day. They did an article on the Yugo brand of cars, > > > > > discussing how so many people dislike them but a certain few are > > > > > very loyal and happy. Maybe the Maggiore & Yugos have a lot in > > > > > common. > > > > > > > > > > If it were me & type acceptance was a problem, I would use the > > > > > Micor or Mastr II as the receiver & the Maggiore as the > > > > > transmitter. > > > > > > > > > > "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back. > > > > > > > > > > > > Go read for your self. Still a pile of the out there that have > > > > > > not been replaced but that does not back it right. Just a fact. > > > > > > 73 Russ. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the side there are about 40 very happy Maggiore users on the > > > > > > list? Most just do not want to get in a back and forth. > > > > > > Again came out and see a good system well installed. > > > > > > 73 Russ, W3CH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "JOHN MACKEY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz > > > > > > Receiver with COR]]] > > > > > > ... snip ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
