|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob, I agree with what you say, but I *think* you disagreed with what I meant. <grin> When we (Scott and I) go to build a repeater for someone or are talking about a radio set that has or needs an FM modulator, it gets referred to as true FM. This helps us to eliminate confusion about what type of modulator needs to be installed into a radio set that ultimately transmits FM in any event. The use of the term allows folks that aren't as radio inclined pick up on the fact there is a difference between FM and PM modulation, and eliminates the question "I thought it was an FM radio". You see, we (Repeater Builder) offer repeaters with both types of modulation schemes, and there need to be a way to differentiate between the two modulators without adding confusion to the whole matter. I'm sorry if you own into our way of thinking, but this was the best way of getting around a bad situation for folks that aren't as radio savvy and you and I (many of our customers), that I could come up with. Kevin Custer Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio ... Mike Morris WA6ILQ
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio ... mch
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio ... Joe Montierth
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio ... mch
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio ... Joe Montierth
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio ... mch
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction scomind
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction Kevin Custer
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction scomind
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction Joe Montierth
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction Kevin Custer
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction Danny Musten
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction scomind
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction Ralph Mowery
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Audio Reproduction Kevin Custer

