Doesn't matter-in fact a repeater that's tied up all day with chatter isn't available for emergency communications. Plus the more time it spends keyed up, the less time till something fails.
-- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Fred Flowers wrote: > Yeah, but does anybody talk on all of them? > > > >>From: "Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: [email protected] >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FCC considers Auxiliary Operation on 2M! >>Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:01:15 -0400 >> >>Joe Montierth wrote: >> >> >> >>>In many parts of the US the 2M band is under-utilized, >>>so I am not opposed to the idea, per-se. If everyone >>>used good common sense, there shouldn't be many >>>problems, but I can see how people feel about this >>>based on their local conditions. >>> >>>Joe >>> >>>Joe >>> >> >>I'd sure like to know where you're gettin the idea that 2M is >>'underutilized'! Everywhere I've been (in the US), there's plenty of >>repeaters. Most areas there's too many! >> >>-- >>Jim Barbour >>WD8CHL >> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
