> "Kevin Bednar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Skipp. I believe the fella I'm getting 
> them from has a manual available as well. 

Great, the manuals are really a must have. 

To cover the UHF MSR, you actually need all 
three manuals (unless you have the microfiche). 
The power supplies are only covered in the 
VHF (green) manual. 

> I was going to run it at about 80 watts 
> instead of the full 110. 

You'd do better to run 65 watts. I've not 
had a derated UHF ~65 watt pa fail when 
used with a circulator/isolator. 

> They also have the factory duplexers with 
> them, and I'm ASSuming they should tune 
> down as well?
> Kevin
> K2KMB 
> 

Yes, if the duplexer probe kits are the 450-470 
range units.  Also check the duplexer for an 
over re-entrant energy coupling problem. It 
requires a spectral display with tracking gen. 

I've found on a few MSR UHF 450-470 versions. 
This will show up as an wider (broader) than 
normal bandpass peak that doesn't seem to allow 
both pass cavities in one path to completely 
align as one peak. I've not yet seen this problem 
with the T-1500 series of motorhead duplexers. 

Lightning stricks might be one cause of this 
problem, the duplexer operation will be less 
than good enough.  I've traced this issue to 
3 different UHF duplexers sent in from various 
(and different) east cost locations where lightning 
is a regular event.  

I'll stay with the west coast earth quakes 
thank you. 

A previous RB post mentioned a problem with the MSR 
Receiver front end suffering damage from lightning 
strikes.  The msr receiver problem might be an 
extention of the same duplexer damage event.  

It does take a spectral display/graph to really 
see the probe kit problem. 

good luck
skipp 

www.radiowrench.com/sonic 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to