If that is meant to imply that old is bad, and newer is better, we
should be talking about adding CDCSS (AKA DPL) to the repeaters, not
CTCSS (AKA PL)! (or maybe even LTR as opposed to CTCSS OR CDCSS)
But, it's a moot point when it was invented - it was not standard in ham
rigs until the 90s.
Joe M.
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
>
> Nate - it's WORSE than than that!! CTCSS was introduced under the trademark
> name of "Private Line" by Motorola in the 1950's. It is FIFTY year old
> technology!!
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:38:52 PM CST
> From: Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SNIP
> > Art's opinion is correct in a lot of people's eyes -- CTCSS, a 1970's
> > technology that's well-proven and works -- shouldn't be so hard to get
> > hams to use 30 years after it was in fairly wide use in the commercial
> > world. And older hams *are* typically the people too lazy to implement
> > it, for all their talk of "I remember when I built my own radio,
> SNIP
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
