That works too...

Wade - KR7K


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerald Pelnar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] in-band linking update


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Wade Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >      Ok, I was not understanding that you were only half duplex on the
> > remote, I would guess that you are linking to another repeater in this
> way?
> > This totally does work, the only drawback to running this way is the
> > courtesy tone and squelch tail for the other repeater are re-broadcasted
> > through your repeater.  You probably already know this but a better
> solution
> > is to use a common link freq. for both TX and RX for the link.  This of
> > coarse would require the other repeater to have a remote radio on the
same
> > freq.
>
> We have a 444.600 repeater with a 444.850 remote base. Good seperation
> between the antennas with no problems. It's arranged so the remote
repeater
> only transmits PL when there is a carrier on it's receiver. PL decode on
the
> remote base doesn't hear id's or even squelch tail. 444.6 also only
> transmits PL when there's a carrier. Users using PL decode don't have to
> listen to ID's or tails either.
>
> Gerald
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to